The term "casuistical" is most often used in discussions where ethical or moral principles are being applied in complex or questionable ways. In legal, philosophical, and theological contexts, casuistical reasoning allows for nuanced and case-specific analyses. However, when used excessively, it can result in arguments that seem convoluted, self-serving, or designed to avoid taking responsibility for one’s actions.
While it can be a legitimate method for resolving complicated moral issues, casuistical reasoning has been criticized for its potential to obscure clear ethical standards and make it easier to justify behavior that might otherwise be unacceptable. As such, the term often carries a negative connotation, especially when applied to personal, political, or corporate decision-making processes.