Casuism, often associated with moral theology, has long been a topic of debate. While some see it as a method of dealing with the complexities of human behavior, others criticize it for its potential to excuse unethical conduct. In modern times, casuists are often seen in the context of legal or philosophical discussions, where they may be tasked with reconciling conflicting values or providing justifications for controversial decisions.
The practice of casuistry has influenced many areas, including law, ethics, and political philosophy, with various thinkers either defending or opposing it. Despite its controversial nature, casuistry remains a significant part of moral and philosophical discourse, particularly in situations where clear-cut answers are not available.